Time is a dare, and I'm trying too...

[allfireburns]

Oh, fine, fine, flist, I give in.

Step One: Look at Ye Olde Character List.
Step Two: Break out your character journals and have them ask my characters questions. If they have no questions, have them... I dunno. Say a word or random phrase and I'll throw a character at them to talk about that word or phrase and they can have existential debates about paperclips if that's their kink. The point is random, pointless, stressfree CR. If you demand an explanation out of one of my characters or have legitimate questions, personally and OOC-ly, I can also deal with that.
Step Three: There is no step three.

I feel like my character list is missing things. Huh. Also, for some reason, LJ hates Barrowman. It has EATEN most of the icons that belong to my Barrowman characters. ...All two of them.

Comments

[thatsortofaman.livejournal.com]

What? Excuse me, I've seen your technology. It's impressive, but not that impressive, and it leads to silly things like gas mask zombies and Time Agents and all sorts of nonsense.

...Also, you can't just experiment with humans on Mars because it's interesting. It's... You can't.

[chulasara.livejournal.com]

[Mendek] Universal reality is sense, so, if your understanding of universal reality cannot account for these elements, your understanding of physical law must be flawed :/

What is a gas mask zombie? This sounds interesting. Interesting is good for science. Do you think science is not interesting?

[thatsortofaman.livejournal.com]

It's what happens when your silly little Chula nanogenes get confused and start trying to rebuild the human race in the image of a dead child. I'd really rather not do that again. Or anything... like that. It ended fine, thanks to me, but even so.

[chulasara.livejournal.com]

It is excellent that technology has unexpected results.

[chulasara.livejournal.com]

[Mendek] Why was the dead child better? I did not design these nanogenes. I like animals. Should I ask Arruk who did?

[thatsortofaman.livejournal.com]

It wasn't better, it was just the first thing your nanogenes stumbled across. Is it really that hard to program them to recognize when something's dead? I don't mind them fixing that, but "fixing" perfectly healthy creatures is just... oh, I give up.

Humans: not for experimentation! That's my point.

[chulasara.livejournal.com]

[Mendek] Experimentation is not "for." Knowing things is good thing. We don't mind.

Do you have an adequate biocognitive biochemical explanation for dead? It is a strange definition.